Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consensus definitions and interpretation templates for dynamic ultrasound imaging of defecatory pelvic floor disorders

Proceedings of the consensus meeting of the pelvic floor disorders consortium of the american society of colon and rectal surgeons, the society of abdominal radiology, the international continence society, the American urogynecologic society, the international urogynecological association, and the society of gynecologic surgeons

  • Consensus Statement
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Shobeiri SA, LeClaire E, Nihira MA, Quiroz LH, O’Donoghue D. Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in endovaginal three-dimensional ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:66–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Gruting IM, Stankiewicz A, Thakar R, IntHout J, Santoro GA, Sultan AH. Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior compartment disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD011482.

  3. Murad-Regadas SM, Karbage SA, Bezerra LS, et al. Dynamic translabial ultrasound versus echodefecography combined with the endovaginal approach to assess pelvic floor dysfunctions: how effective are these techniques? Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:555–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Perniola G, Shek C, Chong CCW, Chew S, Cartmill J, Dietz HP. Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:567–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. AIUM/IUGA practice parameter for the performance of urogynecological ultrasound examinations. Developed in collaboration with the ACR, the AUGS, the AUA, and the SRU. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38:851–864.

  6. Jalalizadeh M, Alshiek J, Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Shobeiri SA. Six-year experience in teaching pelvic floor ultrasonography using pelvic floor phantoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:337–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV, Silva FR, Soares FA, Escalante RD. A novel three-dimensional dynamic anorectal ultrasonography technique (echodefecography) to assess obstructed defecation, a comparison with defecography. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:974–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flusberg M, Kobi M, Bahrami S, et al. Multimodality imaging of pelvic floor anatomy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:1302–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N, et al. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:239–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Gruting IMA, Kluivers K, Sultan AH, et al. Does 4D transperineal ultrasound have additional value over 2D transperineal ultrasound for diagnosing posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defecation syndrome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:784–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuart A, Ignell C, Örnö AK. Comparison of transperineal and endoanal ultrasound in detecting residual obstetric anal sphincter injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98:1624–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ignell C, Örnö AK, Stuart A. Correlations of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) grade, specific symptoms of anal incontinence, and measurements by endoanal and transperineal ultrasound. J Ultrasound. 2021;24:261–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz HP. Ultrasound in the investigation of pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32:431–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Delft K, Shobeiri SA, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Haematomas may masquerade as levator ani muscle defects. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2012;23:S43–244.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Beynon J, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:508–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Nicholls JR, Bartram CI. Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol. 1994;49:368–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg. 1994;81:463–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sultan AH. The role of anal endosonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:559–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roos AM, Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R. The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects: the PREDICT study. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bollard RC, Gardiner A, Lindow S, Phillips K, Duthie GS. Normal female anal sphincter: difficulties in interpretation explained. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:171–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fritsch H, Brenner E, Lienemann A, Ludwikowski B. Anal sphincter complex: reinterpreted morphology and its clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:188–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morren GL, Beets-Tan RG, van Engelshoven JM. Anatomy of the anal canal and perianal structures as defined by phased-array magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1506–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Marshall MM, Nicholls RJ, Kmiot WA. Endosonographic anatomy of the normal anal canal compared with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:176–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sultan AH, Thakar R. Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears to prevent fecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1108–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shobeiri SA, Rostaminia G, Shobeiri H. Development of an in-house endoanal ultrasound teaching phantom. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1393–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Gruting IMA, Stankiewicz A, Kluivers K, et al. Accuracy of four imaging techniques for diagnosis of posterior pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:1017–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Volløyhaug I, Taithongchai A, Arendsen L, van Gruting I, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2020;31:1471–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Taithongchai A, van Gruting IMA, Volloyhaug I, Arendsen LP, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of 3 ultrasound modalities for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:134.e1-134.e9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Meriwether KV, Hall RJ, Leeman LM, Migliaccio L, Qualls C, Rogers RG. Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2015;26:511–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Outcome of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)—role of structured management. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:973–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sioutis D, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Overdiagnosis and rising rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): time for reappraisal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:642–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Starck M, Bohe M, Fortling B, Valentin L. Endosonography of the anal sphincter in women of different ages and parity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:169–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murad-Regadas SM, da S Fernandes GO, Regadas FS, et al. Usefulness of anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of sphincter and pubovisceral muscle defects using a new scoring system in women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:499–507.

  34. Karoui S, Savoye-Collet C, Koning E, Leroi AM, Denis P. Prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:389–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Dhillon S, Kamm MA. Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:741–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MR. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut. 1993;34:685–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Christensen AF, Nyhuus B, Nielsen MB, Christensen H. Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve diagnostic confidence of detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:308–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dietz HP, Walsh C, Subramaniam N, Friedman T. Levator avulsion and vaginal parity: do subsequent vaginal births matter? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2020;31:2311–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Denson LE, Terrell DR, Vesely SK, Peck JD, Quiroz LH, Shobeiri SA. The prevalence of pelvic floor hematoma after vaginal delivery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27:393–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Shobeiri SA, Chesson RR, Gasser RF. The internal innervation and morphology of the human female levator ani muscle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:686.e1-686.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rostaminia G, Peck JD, Quiroz LH, Shobeiri SA. How well can levator ani muscle morphology on 3D pelvic floor ultrasound predict the levator ani muscle function? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2015;26:257–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rostaminia G, Javadian P, Awad C, Shobeiri SA. Ultrasound indicators of rectal support defect in women with obstructive defecatory symptoms. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25:222–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rostaminia G, White D, Hegde A, Quiroz LH, Davila GW, Shobeiri SA. Levator ani deficiency and pelvic organ prolapse severity. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1017–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rostaminia G, Manonai J, Leclaire E, et al. Interrater reliability of assessing levator ani deficiency with 360° 3D endovaginal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2014;25:761–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. van Delft KW, Thakar R, Sultan AH, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. The natural history of levator avulsion one year following childbirth: a prospective study. BJOG. 2015;122:1266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Structured hands-on training in repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): an audit of clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:193–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dietz HP, Shek C, Clarke B. Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:580–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shobeiri SA, Rostaminia G, White D, Quiroz LH. The determinants of minimal levator hiatus and their relationship to the puborectalis muscle and the levator plate. BJOG. 2013;120:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rostaminia G, White DE, Quiroz LH, Shobeiri SA. Levator plate descent correlates with levator ani muscle deficiency. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:55–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Quiroz LH, Shobeiri SA, White D, Wild RA. Does age affect visualization of the levator ani in nulliparous women? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24:1507–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of maternal birth trauma. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2021;32:1953–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, et al. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:374–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Peng Y, He J, Khavari R, Boone TB, Zhang Y. Functional mapping of the pelvic floor and sphincter muscles from high-density surface EMG recordings. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2016;27:1689–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vitton V, Vignally P, Barthet M, et al. Dynamic anal endosonography and MRI defecography in diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: comparison with conventional defecography. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bordeianou L, Savitt L, Dursun A. Measurements of pelvic floor dyssynergia: which test result matters? Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:60–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Van Outryve SM, Van Outryve MJ, De Winter BY, Pelckmans PA. Is anorectal endosonography valuable in dyschesia? Gut. 2002;51:695–700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, et al. A novel procedure to assess anismus using three-dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Regadas FSP, Haas EM, Abbas MA, et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing echodefecography with defecography in the assessment of anorectal dysfunction in patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:686–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Murad-Regadas SM, dos Santos D, Soares G, et al. A novel three-dimensional dynamic anorectal ultrasonography technique for the assessment of perineal descent, compared with defaecography. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:740–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FS, Barreto RG, Rodrigues LV, de Souza MH. A novel two-dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography technique to assess anismus comparing with three-dimensional echodefecography. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:872–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:60–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Albuquerque A, Pereira E. Current applications of transperineal ultrasound in gastroenterology. World J Radiol. 2016;8:370–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Rostaminia G, Peck J, Quiroz L, Shobeiri SA. Levator plate upward lift on dynamic sonography and levator muscle strength. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:1787–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas Filho FS, Regadas FS, et al. Use of dynamic 3-dimensional transvaginal and transrectal ultrasonography to assess posterior pelvic floor dysfunction related to obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:228–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Barthet M, Portier F, Heyries L, et al. Dynamic anal endosonography may challenge defecography for assessing dynamic anorectal disorders: results of a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2000;32:300–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Brusciano L, Limongelli P, Pescatori M, et al. Ultrasonographic patterns in patients with obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:969–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Steensma AB, Oom DM, Burger CW, Schouten WR. Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:533–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. Descent and hypermobility of the rectum in women with obstructed defecation symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2020;31:337–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Shobeiri SA, et al. Interobserver and interdisciplinary reproducibility of 3D endovaginal ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2011;22:53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10:96–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dietz HP, Beer-Gabel M. Ultrasound in the investigation of posterior compartment vaginal prolapse and obstructed defecation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40:14–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Dietz HP, Zhang X, Shek KL, Guzman RR. How large does a rectocele have to be to cause symptoms? A 3D/4D ultrasound study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2015;26:1355–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Pannu HK, Scatarige JC, Eng J. Comparison of supine magnetic resonance imaging with and without rectal contrast to fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. García del Salto L, de Miguel Criado J, Aguilera del Hoyo LF, et al. MR imaging-based assessment of the female pelvic floor. Radiographics. 2014;34:1417–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Dvorkin LS, Hetzer F, Scott SM, Williams NS, Gedroyc W, Lunniss PJ. Open-magnet MR defaecography compared with evacuation proctography in the diagnosis and management of patients with rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:45–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Santoro GA, Shobeiri SA, Petros PP, Zapater P, Wieczorek AP. Perineal body anatomy seen by three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound of asymptomatic nulliparae. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:400–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Murad-Regadas SM, Pinheiro Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, et al. Correlation between echodefecography and 3-dimensional vaginal ultrasonography in the detection of perineal descent in women with constipation symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:1191–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is in the memory of our contributor Dr Giuseppe Gagliardi who died during the drafting of the article. The authors would like to thank Brook Gurland, MD, for providing the videos, and the additional members of the Expert Panel on Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging of Defecatory Disorders of the Pelvic Floor: Amy Halverson, M.D.; Shuqing Ding, Ph.D.; Andrea Ferrara, M.D.; Ari Steiner, M.D.; David Sheyn, M.D.; Joanne Favuzza, M.D.; Sergio Larach, M.D.; Yara Lima de Mendonca, M.D.; Miles Murphy, M.D.; and Steven Wexner, M.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Bordeianou.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s website (www.dcrjournal.com).

Jonia Alshiek, Sthela M. Murad-Regadas, and Anders Mellgren contributed equally as first coauthors.

Liliana Bordeianou and S. Abbas Shobeiri contributed equally as senior coauthors.

This article is being published concurrently in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, International Urogynecological Journal, and Urogynecology. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal’s style. Citation from any of the 3 journals can be used when citing this article.

This consensus has been reviewed by the supporting societies.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshiek, J., Murad-Regadas, S.M., Mellgren, A. et al. Consensus definitions and interpretation templates for dynamic ultrasound imaging of defecatory pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J 34, 603–619 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05414-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05414-z

Keywords

Navigation