ResearchEducationImproving medical student knowledge of female pelvic floor dysfunction and anatomy: a randomized trial
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of medical students at Alpert Medical School of Brown University (Providence, RI) who were rotating through their obstetrics and gynecology clerkship from November 2007 to May 2008. Our student population rotating through obstetrics and gynecology includes both third- and fourth-year students.
Students at our institution may delay completion of core clerkships until their fourth year to complete elective rotations based on their interests.
Results
After randomization, the first 2 clerkships of the study period were randomized to usual teaching and the second 2 clerkships were randomized to the intervention. Forty-three students were enrolled in the study (21 randomized to intervention; 22 randomized to usual teaching). All students completed participation and pre- and postintervention questionnaires. All students randomized to the trainer were able to complete all modules during their trainer session, and the time needed to complete the
Comment
The field of female pelvic floor disorders, whose foundation rests on the basic framework of pelvic anatomy, is becoming increasingly important as our population ages. We developed a novel, computer-based learning trainer that improves both knowledge and attitudes of medical students regarding female PFD and PA and can be easily integrated into an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship curriculum.
As learners begin to fall into the net generation group, teaching formats need to change to meet
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics for awarding the authors the APGO/Abbott Medical Education Grant to fund the completion of the Pelvic Trainer and the Division of Educational Informatics and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the New York University School of Medicine, who supported initial development of the pelvic trainer. We also thank John Qualter and the staff at Biodigital for the creation of the pelvic trainer.
References (14)
- et al.
Tutor versus computer: a prospective comparison of interactive tutorial and computer-assisted instruction in radiology education
Acad Radiol
(2002) - et al.
Preliminary evaluation of the Web Initiative for Surgical Education (WISE-MD)
Am J Surg
(2007) - et al.
A comparison of an interactive computer-based method with a conventional reading approach for learning pelvic anatomy
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2006) US interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin
- et al.
Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women
JAMA
(2008) APGO medical student educational objectives
(2004)- et al.
An interactive computer-based tool for teaching the segmental anatomy of the liver: usefulness in the education of residents and fellows
Am J Roentgenol
(1997)
Cited by (19)
To the point: A primer on medical education research
2012, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :A common opportunity for educational research arises from the implementation of a novel teaching tool to improve either knowledge or clinical skills. Hampton and Sung15 sought to determine the effect of an interactive computer trainer on knowledge and attitudes of medical students regarding female pelvic anatomy and pelvic floor dysfunction. This research question follows the PICOT format, with the exception of defining a study time frame.
Differential impact of unguided versus guided use of a multimedia introduction to equine obstetrics in veterinary education
2012, Computers and EducationCitation Excerpt :In this context as well, students will remember more when using animated movies as compared to lessons enriched with images as illustrations (Bernardo, 2003). The integration of such multimedia applications in the curriculum of veterinary students seems to improve medical knowledge about diagnosis and management in equine obstetrics as has been shown with a similar educational project in human medical education (Hampton & Sung, 2010). Equine obstetrics presents an instructional challenge due to the complex nature of the knowledge domain.
Resident Education and Training in Female Sexuality: Results of a National Survey
2011, Journal of Sexual MedicineCitation Excerpt :Prior reports suggest that computer‐based learning augments traditional books and lectures. Hampton et al. reported findings of a randomized controlled trial in which an interactive computer trainer improved medical students' knowledge and attitudes regarding female pelvic floor dysfunction and anatomy [10]. The National Institute of Health Consensus Conference in 1993 presented a Statement on Impotence which reported that most healthcare professionals are either uninformed or misinformed about sexual problems and, therefore, fail to address them [11].
Female Pelvic Floor Immersive Simulation: A Randomized Trial to Test the Effectiveness of a Virtual Reality Anatomic Model on Resident Knowledge of Female Pelvic Anatomy
2019, Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyCitation Excerpt :In fact, residents reported that the VR model improved understanding in all areas of pelvic anatomy, except for pelvic vasculature. Similar to our findings, Hampton and Sung [2] reported no differences in postintervention anatomic knowledge scores between resident groups undergoing exposure to a computer-based virtual pelvis trainer over a 1-month period; however, residents also perceived that their knowledge of pelvic anatomy and of female pelvic floor disorders was improved. Garg et al [10] reported no advantage to medical student learners’ anatomic knowledge when given improved spatial perspectives using a computer-based model.
This study was supported in part by the 2007 Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics/Abbott Medical Education Program Award.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Cite this article as: Hampton BS, Sung VW. Improving medical student knowledge of female pelvic floor dysfunction and anatomy: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:601.e1-8.